ESPN.com reports that commissioners from the 11 Football Bowl Subdivisions conferences are
considering a proposal that would use a selection committee to choose
the teams for a potential four-team playoff.
I believe
this is just a small band aide being placed over a gaping wound. The BCS
has already been challenged as a non-inclusive monopoly that operates
purely out of money and power. Now they want to add a four-team playoff for
the national championship to keep the bowl system and more importantly
the BCS system in tact. The proposed -team playoff is a another word
for a 'plus-one' game that would still leave a number of top 10 teams questioning whether or not they truly had a fair shot at the title.
Here is the official statement from the BCS on eliminating the proposed 8 and 16 team playoffs:
"Having carefully reviewed calendars and schedules, we believe that
either an eight-team or a 16-team playoff would diminish the regular
season and harm the bowls. College
football's regular season is too important to diminish and we do not
believe it's in the best interest of student-athletes, fans, or alumni
to harm the regular season. Accordingly, as we proceed to review
our options for improving the postseason, we have taken off the table
both an eight-team and 16-team playoff."
The main argument for not expanding the playoff field is that the commissioners do not want to diminish the regular season or harm the bowl system. In what sport does a regular not matter when there are playoffs at the end? If you have a losing regular season, you miss the playoffs! The fewer games you play (which college football does playing 13 games or fewer) to make the post season makes each one even that more important (seems to work out for the NFL just fine). Saving the bowl system? I'll address that in my proposal below.
It bothers me that 60 and 70 year old commissioners are making
decisions for modern-day changes. I do not want to pigeon-hole these
'distinguished' commissioners, but let's just say the old-timers like to
keep things the same. However, I do like the idea of a selection
committee for determining teams participating in a playoff. The
selection committee only works if the right people are chosen.
Who really needs to be involved in deciding the fate of post
season college football play?
Along with the conference commissioners, there needs to be more college head
coaches and former head coaches involved in the process. Too many times
actual football people are left out of discussions where their opinions
and input could really matter. How else can you gauge the state of the college game without asking those who are on the field playing the games? Also, how about getting thoughts from
former and current college football players about the effects or
non-effects of playing additional post-season games. I'd like to see more university athletic directors involved in discussions as well.
Here's my proposal:
1.)
Kill the current
bowl system. The bowl system to me is equivalent to everyone getting a
trophy in a youth soccer league. In the current bowl almost every Division I team is involved, but we
all know that the only game truly matters is the
Rose Bowl
I mean BCS Championship game. I know playing in bowl games brings in
lots of money, but they are other ways to get corporate sponsors and
advertising dollars. Mainly by putting out a product that captives
people in wanting to attend or watch on TV. That's what the NCAA basketball
tournament has done for years. There are also alternative routes that need to be explored like inter-conference tournaments (i.e. ACC/Big Ten Challenge) and 4-8 team corporate sponsored tournaments (Maui Invitation, Cowboy Stadium Classic). All options are revenue generators that can be played before the conference schedule starts.
2.)
Use the Division II model for football playoffs where 24 teams play for the championship. The teams are broken up in to 4 regions containing 6 teams. The #1 and #2 seeds are given first round byes with the other teams playing each other according to seed.
See the bracket break down here.
Using this 24 team playoff format allows elite teams from the powers conference to have a chance to compete as well as giving non-BCS conference teams a chance (Boise State, TCU, Utah).
I suggest playing rounds 1 and 2 on the higher seeds home field. Those games would take place mid to late November. The quarterfinal and semifinal games would be play at the end of December or early January. This would give players and fans a break in between for rest and travel.
3.)
Eliminate all conference championship games and play 2 less regular season games. Playing less games during the regular season will free up teams to play additional post-season games. Playoffs could be played in November and resume for champion play at end of December or early January. As I stated before, the less regular season games played makes each one that much more important. Plus, it rids the system of 'cupcake' scheduling.
Conference champions from the 6 power conferences would be automatics. Cases where there are two-way or three-way ties would not matter because the selection committee would look at each conference champion on a case by case basis.
4.)
Use the current BCS bowl games for national quarterfinal and semifinal games. For example 4 teams would go to Sugar Bowl and 4 would go the Orange Bowl. The winners would square off the following week at the Rose Bowl or the Fiesta Bowl.
5.)
A neutral site will be chosen for the national championship. The championship game could be played at a number of neutral sites like Cowboy Stadium or Lucas Oil Field. Various cities could bid for the game like the Super Bowl. This would open the game up to a broader audience and create even more publicity for a game looking to generate revenue.
*Proposals #4 and #5 seem like a lot of travel in a short period of time, but I would
argue that during the regular season a college football team could
travel three weeks in a row playing road games. How would this be any
different? For those arguing about how family would travel. I suggest
the NCAA open their overflowing wallets and allow money and tickets for
players families traveling to the playoff games.
What
about traveling fan bases? Well, we can't have everything. If you want
to follow your team you will, if not then TV is the best option. Either
way this is the sacrifice I think most fans will make to see a playoff
and a 'real' champion crowned.